As I looked at my friend Al
Koehler, we gave each other that “oh boy” look. We were knee-deep in receiving
too much unproductive attention.
Koehler and I were Army
lieutenants and each of us was responsible for a battery of six howitzers, a
type of cannon. We shared the same problems with accuracy for our howitzers.
This was critical given that we were firing at targets up to 10 miles away. After
eliminating the possibility of human error, we decided to test the alignment of
the sight with the bore of the howitzer.
This was an involved process
requiring a large hanger, a plum line suspended from the ceiling and great
attention to detail. When we tested the alignment, we found that 10 out of 12
howitzers had problems. Little did we know the host of other problems that
would come our way that day.
Koehler and I contacted our
battery commanders and explained what we found. Shortly thereafter my commander,
Captain Nick Perkins, arrived at our location. After asking several questions
and evaluating the conduct of the tests, Perkins notified our battalion
commander of the test results. From that point on, we had too many high-ranking
officers scrutinizing our process.
They examined every minor
detail, repeatedly, with little attention focused on the real problem – that
the howitzers were out of alignment. During this process, Perkins interjected
himself into the discussion, championing the core problem. However, the
higher-ups persisted in their efforts to focus on fixing accountability. After
watching the discussion go around in circles, Perkins informed me that he would
be available by phone and left.
Finally, the problem was
identified: the alignment needed to be corrected. While we were packing up to
leave, Koehler and I were directed not to test all the howitzers at the same
time. Our test results had negative repercussions for readiness evaluation
purposes and following such a schedule would minimize the impact of this
problem.
Upon returning to the motor
park, I informed Perkins of the decision to stagger future tests. He turned his
head, sighed and then uttered an expletive in his drawn-out Southern accent.
Perkins went on to explain that it was stupid, as it wasn’t solving the problem
and conducting the test in this manner would require too much time. He shared
that the problem was readily apparent and that too much effort was expended
trying to avoid blame.
I learned a valuable lesson
that day. When a problem comes up, focus on solving the problem first. Get it
working. Then, if holding someone accountable is prudent, do that after the
solution is in motion. I also learned that by using this approach, more
problems were surfaced sooner.
Our howitzers were aligned
properly by the support folks and delivered accurate artillery fire. Perkins
retired many years later as a major general. I’m confident he continued to
focus on solving the problem first and didn’t shy away from adding emphasis
with his Southern accent.
No comments:
Post a Comment